As with primary and epidemiologic analysis, the scientific high quality of clinical trials analysis is determined by the scientific benefit of the hypotheses and questions addressed and on the appropriateness and rigor of the strategies utilized by the researcher.
Further, a proposed analysis protocol have to be reviewed inside the framework of the establishment’s analysis priorities. The subsequent progress of the analysis exercise have to be evaluated to insure the mission is progressing appropriately to handle the questions posed.
At the NCCC, there are two committees liable for these protocol review and monitoring features, insuring the scientific and analysis high quality of clinical trials: the Clinical Investigations Committee (CIC) and the Quality Assurance Committee (QAC). The determine under outlines the steps for protocol activation and continuation. An outline of CIC and QAC features and tasks follows.
protocol review and monitoring system: clinical investigations &high quality assuran
As with primary and epidemiologic analysis, the scientific high quality of clinical trials analysis is determined by the scientific benefit of the hypotheses and questions addressed and on the appropriateness and rigor of the strategies utilized by the researcher.
Further, a proposed analysis protocol have to be reviewed inside the framework of the establishment’s analysis priorities. The subsequent progress of the analysis exercise have to be evaluated to insure the mission is progressing appropriately to handle the questions posed.
At the NCCC, there are two committees liable for these protocol review and monitoring features, insuring the scientific and analysis high quality of clinical trials: the Clinical Investigations Committee (CIC) and the Quality Assurance Committee (QAC). The determine under outlines the steps for protocol activation and continuation. An outline of CIC and QAC features and tasks follows.
protocol review and monitoring system: clinical investigations &high quality assura
As with primary and epidemiologic analysis, the scientific high quality of clinical trials analysis is determined by the scientific benefit of the hypotheses and questions addressed and on the appropriateness and rigor of the strategies utilized by the researcher.
Further, a proposed analysis protocol have to be reviewed inside the framework of the establishment’s analysis priorities. The subsequent progress of the analysis exercise have to be evaluated to insure the mission is progressing appropriately to handle the questions posed.
At the NCCC, there are two committees liable for these protocol review and monitoring features, insuring the scientific and analysis high quality of clinical trials: the Clinical Investigations Committee (CIC) and the Quality Assurance Committee (QAC). The determine under outlines the steps for protocol activation and continuation. An outline of CIC and QAC features and tasks follows.