In California vineyards, spore dispersal of fungi that cause grapevine trunk diseases Botryosphaeria dieback and Eutypa dieback occurs with winter rains. Spores infect through pruning wounds made to the woody structure of the vine in winter. Better timing of preventative practices that minimize infection may benefit from routine spore-trapping, which could pinpoint site-specific time frames of spore dispersal. To speed pathogen detection from environmental spore samples, we identified species-specific PCR primers and protocols. Then we compared the traditional culture-based method versus our new DNA-based method.
PCR primers for Botryosphaeria-dieback pathogen Neofusicoccum parvum and Eutypa-dieback pathogen Eutypa lata were confirmed species-specific, through extensive testing of related species (in families Botryosphaeriaceae and Diatrypaceae, respectively), other trunk-disease pathogens, and saprophytic fungi that sporulate in vineyards.
Consistent detection of N. parvum was achieved from spore suspensions used fresh or stored at -20°C, whereas consistent detection of E. lata was achieved only with a new spore-lysis method, using zirconia/silica beads in a FastPrep homogenizer (MP Biomedicals; Solon, Ohio, USA), and only from spore suspensions used fresh. Freezing E. lata spores at -20°C made detection inconsistent.•From environmental samples, spores of E. lata were detected only via PCR, whereas spores of N. parvum were detected both via PCR and in culture.
Elucidating biofilm diversity on water lily leaves through 16S rRNA amplicon analysis: Comparison of four DNA extraction kits
Premise: Within a broader study on leaf fossilization in freshwater environments, a long-term study on the development and microbiome composition of biofilms on the foliage of aquatic plants has been initiated to understand how microbes and biofilms contribute to leaf decay and preservation.
Here, water lily leaves are employed as a study model to investigate the relationship between bacterial microbiomes, biodegradation, and fossilization. We compare four DNA extraction kits to reduce biases in interpretation and to identify the most suitable kit for the extraction of DNA from bacteria associated with biofilms on decaying water lily leaves for 16S rRNA amplicon analysis.
Methods: We extracted surface-associated DNA from Nymphaea leaves in early stages of decay at two water depth levels using four commercially available kits to identify the most suitable protocol for bacterial extraction, applying a mock microbial community standard to enable a reliable comparison of the kits.
Results: Kit 4, the FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil, resulted in high DNA concentrations with better quality and yielded the most accurate depiction of the mock community. Comparison of the leaves at two water depths showed no significant differences in community composition.
Discussion: The success of Kit 4 may be attributed to its use of bead beating with a homogenizer, which was more efficient in the lysis of Gram-positive bacteria than the manual vortexing protocols used by the other kits. Our results show that microbial composition on leaves during early decay remains comparable and may change only in Bio Basic Bead Homogenizers later stages of decomposition.
Intravitreal Injection and Quantitation of Infection Parameters in a Mouse Model of Bacterial Endophthalmitis
Intraocular bacterial infections are a danger to the vision. Researchers use animal models to investigate the host and bacterial factors and immune response pathways associated with infection to identify viable therapeutic targets and to test drugs to prevent blindness. The intravitreal injection technique is used to inject organisms, drugs, or other substances directly into the vitreous cavity in the posterior segment of the eye.
Here, we demonstrated this injection technique to initiate infection in the mouse eye and the technique of quantifying intraocular bacteria. Bacillus cereus was grown in brain heart infusion liquid media for 18 hours and resuspended to a concentration 100 colony forming units (CFU)/0.5 µL. A C57BL/6J mouse was anesthetized using a combination of ketamine and xylazine. Using a picoliter microinjector and glass capillary needles, 0.5 µL of the Bacillus suspension was injected into the mid vitreous of the mouse eye.
The contralateral control eye was either injected with sterile media (surgical control) or was not injected (absolute control). At 10 hours post infection, mice were euthanized, and eyes were harvested using sterile surgical tweezers and placed into a tube containing 400 µL sterile PBS and 1 mm sterile glass beads. For ELISAs or myeloperoxidase assays, proteinase inhibitor was added to the tubes. For RNA extraction, the appropriate lysis buffer was added. Eyes were homogenized in a tissue homogenizer for 1-2 minutes.
Homogenates were serially diluted 10-fold in PBS and track diluted onto agar plates. The remainder of the homogenates were stored at -80 °C for additional assays. Plates were incubated for 24 hours and CFU per eye was quantified. These techniques result in reproducible infections in mouse eyes and facilitate quantitation of viable bacteria, the host immune response, and omics of host and bacterial gene expression.
Mechanical/Physical Methods of Cell Disruption and Tissue Homogenization
This chapter covers the various methods of mechanical cell disruption and tissue homogenization that are currently commercially available for processing small samples s < 1 mL) to larger multikilogram production quantities. These mechanical methods of lysing do not introduce chemicals or enzymes to the system. However, the energies required when using these “harsh,” high mechanical energy methods can be enough to damage the very components being sought.
The destruction of cell membranes and walls is effected by subjecting the cells (a) to shearing by liquid flow, (b) to exploding by pressure differences between inside and outside of cell, (c) to collision forces by impact of beads or paddles, or (d) a combination of these forces.Practical suggestions to optimize each method, where to acquire such equipment, and links to reference sources are included. Several novel technologies are presented.
Proteomic evaluation of plasma membrane fraction prepared from mouse liver and kidney using a bead homogenizer: Enrichment of drug-related transporter proteins
Quantifying the protein levels of drug transporters in plasma membrane fraction helps elucidate the function of these transporters. In this study, we conducted a proteomic evaluation of enriched drug-related transporter proteins in plasma membrane fraction prepared from mouse liver and kidney tissues using the Membrane Protein Extraction Kit and a bead homogenizer. Crude and plasma membrane fractions were prepared using either the Dounce or bead homogenizer, and protein levels were determined using quantitative proteomics.
In liver tissues, the plasma membrane fractions were more enriched in transporter proteins than the crude membrane fractions; the average enrichment ratios of plasma-to-crude membrane fractions were 3.31 and 6.93 using the Dounce and bead homogenizers, respectively. The concentrations of transporter proteins in plasma membrane fractions determined using the bead homogenizer were higher than those determined using the Dounce homogenizer.
Meanwhile, in kidney tissues, the plasma membrane fractions were enriched in transporters localized in the brush-border membrane to the same degree for both the homogenizers; however, the membrane fractions obtained using either homogenizer were not enriched in Na+/K+-ATPase and transporters localized in the basolateral membrane. These results indicate that fractionation, using the bead homogenizer, yielded transporter-enriched plasma membrane fractions from mouse liver and kidney tissues; however, no enrichment of basolateral transporters was observed in plasma membrane fractions prepared from kidney tissues.
Ceramic grinding bars 3/8X5/8, 45°, angled medium ceramic homogenizers pack of 100 |
|||
IPD9600-3858-1 | Benchmark Scientific | each | 39.14 EUR |
Ceramic grinding bars 3/8X7/8 , 45°, angled medium ceramic homogenizers pack of 100 |
|||
IPD9600-3878-1 | Benchmark Scientific | each | 39.14 EUR |
BeadBug™ Microtube homogenizer, 115V |
|||
D1030 | Benchmark Scientific | 1 each | 1000.42 EUR |
BeadBug™ Microtube homogenizer, 230V |
|||
D1030-E | Benchmark Scientific | 1 PC | 1000.42 EUR |
BeadBug 6, Six Position Homogenizer, 115V |
|||
D1036 | Benchmark Scientific | 1 each | 2696.23 EUR |
BeadBug 6, Six Position Homogenizer, 230V |
|||
D1036-E | Benchmark Scientific | 1 PC | 2696.23 EUR |
BeadBug 6 Six Position Homogenizer 230V - EACH |
|||
HOM3018 | Scientific Laboratory Supplies | EACH | 3825.9 EUR |
BeadBlaster 96 Ball Mill Homogenizer, 120V US Plug |
|||
IPD9600 | Benchmark Scientific | each | 11892.18 EUR |
BeadBlaster 96 Ball Mill Homogenizer, 230V EU Plug |
|||
IPD9600-E | Benchmark Scientific | each | 11892.18 EUR |
BeadBlaster™ Microtube homogenizer, 115V |
|||
D2400 | Benchmark Scientific | 1 each | 9460.6 EUR |
BeadBlaster™ Microtube homogenizer, 230V |
|||
D2400-E | Benchmark Scientific | 1 PC | 9460.6 EUR |
BeadBlaster Microtube homogenizer 230V - EACH |
|||
HOM3012 | Scientific Laboratory Supplies | EACH | 13678.2 EUR |
BeadBug Microtube homogenizer - EACH |
|||
SLS1402 | Scientific Laboratory Supplies | EACH | 1629.45 EUR |
BeadBlaster™ 24 Refrigerated Microtube Homogenizer, 115V |
|||
D2400-R | Benchmark Scientific | 1 each | 15098.14 EUR |
BeadBlaster™ 24 Refrigerated Microtube Homogenizer, 230V |
|||
D2400-R-E | Benchmark Scientific | 1 each | 15098.14 EUR |
BeadBlaster 24 Refrigerated Microtube Homogenizer 230V - EACH |
|||
HOM3078 | Scientific Laboratory Supplies | EACH | 24792.75 EUR |
Homogenizer stand for Agile™ Hand-held homogenizer |
|||
AHM1 | ACTGene | VS | 414.21 EUR |
Homogenizer stand for Agile? Hand-held homogenizer |
|||
AHM1-VS | ACTGene | each | 634.8 EUR |
Microtube homogenizer, 115V |
|||
BCM1200 | Bio Basic | 1 pcs, 1 UNIT | 11944.61 EUR |
Microtube homogenizer, 115V |
|||
BCM1201 | Bio Basic | 1 pcs, 1 UNIT | 1224.14 EUR |
HOMOGENIZER |
|||
H291 | PhytoTechnology Laboratories | 1EA | 739.98 EUR |
SpeedMill PLUS, Homogenizer 220 V |
|||
AJ845-00007-2 | Westburg | each | 11118 EUR |
Nail Homogenizer |
|||
099CE2000 | Glascol | each | 450 EUR |
TUBE, HOMOGENIZER (25/PACK) |
|||
H293 | PhytoTechnology Laboratories | 1EA | 346.67 EUR |
Stand for D1000 Homogenizer |
|||
D1000-ST | GenDepot | ea | 530 EUR |
Dounce Tissue Homogenizer |
|||
1998-1 | Biovision | each | 470.4 EUR |
Homogenizer with plain pestle (P.P.) 2 |
|||
GW124-1NO | EWC Diagnostics | 1 unit | 18.02 EUR |
Homogenizer with plain pestle (P.P.) 5 |
|||
GW125-1NO | EWC Diagnostics | 1 unit | 18.02 EUR |